Adverts
In the automotive world, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Over the years, the Brazilian market has been home to a fascinating variety of models, some acclaimed for their innovative design and others… well, not so much. In this special edition, we delve into the intriguing universe of cars considered the ugliest ever sold in Brazil. From eccentric designs to stylistic experiments that defied convention, each car on this list tells a unique story about the risks and rewards in the world of automotive design.
It's not just about aesthetics; is an exploration of how functionality, economics and even culture influence a vehicle's appearance. From models that look like they came out of a comic book to those that make us question designers' decisions, get ready for an unforgettable tour of the most curious and, at times, misunderstood side of Brazilian automotive design. Let's find out together which cars have earned the unenviable title of “the ugliest” and the stories behind their creations.
Adverts
Embark with us on this visual and historical journey, where beauty and strangeness meet on the roads of Brazil.
10 – Toyota Etios Cross.
O Toyota Etios Cross, launched as an adventurous version of the already well-known Etios, has always generated heated debates about its design. For some, its robust lines and black plastic details that simulate off-road protection offer a unique charm, while for others, these characteristics deviate significantly from the elegance traditionally associated with to the Toyota brand, categorizing it, in the eyes of many, as one of the least attractive models on the market. This divergence of opinions highlights how subjective beauty can be, especially in a car segment that tries to mix urban elements with a more adventurous feel.
Adverts
In terms of performance, the Etios Cross leaves nothing to be desired, especially considering its segment. With a 1.5 flex engine, it offers a reasonable balance between power and economy. In the context of 2023, The average consumption of the Etios Cross is around 9.5 km/l in the city and 11.5 km/l on the highway with ethanol, and 12.5 km/l in the city and 15 km/l on the highway with gasoline. These numbers reflect decent economic performance, suitable for those looking for a car with a sportier feel without compromising too much on fuel consumption.
As for the value of market, the Etios Cross, in 2023, sails in a price range that reflects both its construction quality and its moderate popularity. On the used market, a model in good condition varies between R$ 50,000 and R$ 70,000, depending on factors such as year, mileage and conservation. This price range positions the Etios Cross as an affordable option for those looking for a car with SUV characteristics, but with the practicality and cost-benefit of a compact hatchback.
9 – Nissan Tiida Sedan.
O Nissan Tiida Sedan, a model that provoked mixed reactions in the Brazilian automotive market, is often remembered for its controversial design. With lines that defied traditional aesthetic standards, the Tiida Sedan It did not win the unanimous admiration of enthusiasts for its appearance. While some appreciated its uniqueness and practicality, others they considered it one of the most “boring” cars available on the market. This division of opinion made the Tiida Sedan a notable example of how a car's design can influence its acceptance by the public.
As for performance, the Nissan Tiida Sedan had a reasonably efficient average consumption for the category. In 2023, this vehicle, equipped with a 1.8 engine, recorded an average combined consumption (city and highway) around 12 km/l, a respectable number for a sedan of its size. This reflected a balance between acceptable performance and fuel efficiency, making it an economical everyday choice.
See too:
In terms of market value, the Nissan Tiida Sedan from models before 2023 It fit into an attractive price range for those looking for a used sedan with good value for money. Depending on its condition and mileage, the average value was around R$ 35,000 to R$ 45,000. This price positioned it as an affordable choice for consumers who valued functionality and efficiency over a more aesthetically appreciated design.